[elastic_church]

Despite the "expose'" that author is behind the times.

There are even more effective ways to grow accounts faster, with real followers.

Instagress can be complementary, if you want it to be.

The author's conclusions are also wrong or incomplete, such as why Facebook/Instagram allow it despite being against their TOS. They're wrong about how to effectively spot instagress botters, as Instagress is a HIGHLY customizable bot and the obviousness is up to the user

[JohnJamesRambo]

Could you clue us in to your insight?

[elastic_church]

The instagram economy is booming and this is primarily a public service announcement about the incompleteness of the author's expose'

The only nugget I can reveal is that many users have bought into a social contract of rags to riches, "organic growth" from nothing, and just like real society, this is the least effective and time wasting set of rules to play by.

[soared]

Can you share some more with us, or is this a 'I've made $50k on insta this year alone - but I can't tell you my secrets. Unless you visit my website.'

[elastic_church]

its a "reject this subtle advertisement for Instagress as you saw how effective it is despite the criticisms"

when there are obviously other competitors that don't take a bot approach, shouldn't be that hard to accept

[strgrd]

What in the fuck are you alluding to, can you stop being so vague and offer an actual criticism or insight?

[builtinbuffalo]

Its probably some combination of paid "shout outs" from popular accounts to the new account they are attempting to build and reposted or shared content where the popular account showcases a piece of content from the new account.

There are also likely to be large, influential, account networks that are real and when used to boost a new account, very effective (I know numerous people on instagram with multiple million+ follower accounts).

All of this is similar to content marketing and link building strategies that have been effective for a decade plus.

[elastic_church]

I honestly thought some social media marketers would come out the woodwork and agree - equally vaguely - but I guess they aren't here

Its more beneficial not to be more specific, and seeing that nobody else has anything to add and are more-so frustrated at the asymmetric information then its a form of validation.

But I've taken accounts from 0 followers to 10k+ followers within a week's time. All the follower's accounts are non-bots, any random selection would be highly engaged real humans, and new posts maintain around 2%-5% of the followers liking or viewing+liking without the use of hash tags at all. There are interesting skews in the demographics, worth its own article, but I'm fine without it.

For follower count alone, instagress would take months to do the equivalent, as its activity is slow and varied to avoid detection as a bot. Also the unfollow rate begins to match the speed at which it can safely attract followers, in the low thousands, if you don't have an exceptionally active niche.