[odonnellryan]

Easy: they don't benefit at all from it. I'm not a lawyer, but I can easily see how it's not a good idea to talk bad about someone who used your platform.

There's nothing to gain, and a lot to lose by doing so. It's kinda lose-lose for Twitter, but few people seriously care about Milo getting banned.

[Chris2048]

Milo has explicitly stated he didn't incite harassment, so the benefit would be demonstrating that the ban was not politically-based.

> it's not a good idea to talk bad

talking bad vs providing evidence of intent to incite harassment.

> but few people seriously care about Milo getting banned

Hmm, perhaps in your own bubble

[odonnellryan]

Why do you care so much what Twitter does?

[Chris2048]

Ad Hom. Do 'people' care, or don't they? That was your statement.

[odonnellryan]

I'm not really debating you since there isn't much to debate. I'm just curious why you care so much about what a private company allows on their platform.

[Chris2048]

I'm not really engaging with your curiosity, either.

[odonnellryan]

ok.