[politicalist]

In response to your question, your post currently has 9 points, and virtually all it offers is an ad-hominem implication (people who are merely interested in this article aren't "critical thinkers", presumably unlike you) and an unsupported claim (a right to food will be disastrous).

Please re-read HN's approach to comments. Not only is the linked article potentially "deeply interesting", your comment appears to be "empty and negative". You could easily fix that by offering a persuasive argument.

http://ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html