|
|
|
|
|
by heimatau
3367 days ago
|
|
> By the way, I hope you realize that these two viewpoints are not completely orthogonal. You win the Fields Medal. :) I appreciate your feedback and you seemed to have interpreted my text words as intended. I disagree with your conclusion but you do understand my position. I'm grateful for that. So much can be misunderstood through the web. I point others to your comment to hopefully elaborate. I do think Quanta does a poor job at maintaining the rigor and no they aren't as bad as other publications. But we should hold them to a higher standard (heck all publishers). They are closer to what I think is needed in the industry but it's too much hype for me and not enough rigor. |
|