[danieljscott]

Why is that? I've heard lots of people saying that, but not had any concrete reasons why. As far as I know, he's generally correct about the things he discusses. And pretty good at making technical discussions interesting.

[pkd]

http://attrition.org/errata/charlatan/steve_gibson/

[borplk]

Nonsense.

Steve has been on public record for at least the past 12 years weekly on Security Now explaining things clearly and carefully. I've learned a lot from him and am very thankful.

If he even makes a tiny mistake on a podcast episode about something he comes back with a correction the next week.

He's been sharing his knowledge and expertise generously and a lot of people like me enjoy listening to him for 2 hours every week.

If you have a criticism write it out properly.

[danieljscott]

Yeah, I've seen that site - 1 item in the last 10 years. Not a lot considering that he broadcasts 2 hrs a week. Maybe he's improved since the early 2000s?

Anything else? I don't really understand the extreme reaction he seems to get.