|
|
|
|
|
by candiodari
3367 days ago
|
|
Given the claim in the title they talk about "men and women". So the sample size is small because: 1) zero variance in location 2) very little variance in age (all undergraduate) (variances of the ages: 1.33 to 7.19, so 70% of their samples all were in two age ranges, one 3 year wide, one 14 year wide) 3) cultural variation : essentially zero (?) they didn't even bother to check AFAICT |
|