|
|
|
|
|
by exclusiv
3363 days ago
|
|
I can explain that because it's an important data point that should be driving the positioning for the AGW crowd. I personally think that AGW is overblown, the models and methodologies are suspect and I question human's impact on climate change. However, I can easily get behind renewables. We shouldn't be dependent upon finite energy resources, many of which are largely controlled by dictatorships. Our investments in renewable clean energy can bring energy costs down for everyone, they're better for the environment (regardless of whether AGW is real, not debateable), and it could keep our money in our country instead of sending it overseas to non-Allied, terrorist supporting countries (hits pro-Trump, anti-AGW crowd). And oh, on the chance that the AGW crowd is right - we also saved humanity for the win! We've all aligned, some for different reasons. This is the right positioning and the GW alarmists are shooting themselves in the foot because they aren't telling the right story that almost everyone can get behind. |
|