|
|
|
|
|
by pseudalopex
3369 days ago
|
|
I only brought up the distinction between closed shop and union shop to cite sources. You can call them whatever you like. The Supreme Court says unions can't require actual membership, only fees, and in 28 states they can't require that either. Hiring halls are subject to the same laws. Individual cases of discrimination can be hard to prove, but patterns are hard to defend. Federal law sets the terms of union representation. Some union members would be happy to have collective bargaining for union members and individual bargaining for non-members, but that isn't an option. |
|