Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by droog 3372 days ago
From http://docs.http-prompt.com/en/latest/contributor-guide.html:

> Fork is a term invented by GitHub.

No, it is not.

Also, do I get royalties for my contributions to this open source project? Since you're literally selling other people a gated license to the code I contribute, I'm wondering how this works from a legal perspective.

4 comments

> Fork is a term invented by GitHub.

Amazing, isn't it? With the internet, we have this wealth of knowledge at our fingertips and yet so few use it.

> With the internet, we have this wealth of knowledge at our fingertips and yet so few use it.

And yet, you still can't believe everything you read on the Internet.

You can at least fact check who invented the term fork.
Hi, author here. Thanks for the feedback! I'll fix that fork term mistake soon. That is a stupid mistake.

I just started this subscription recently as an experiment to see if I can make a sustainable open source project. I haven't made any money from it yet. And I haven't decided if and how we should give royalties with contributors. If I get lucky, the business model works, this topic is open for discussion among contributors.

Doing that without a Contributors License Agreement seems at the very least iffy. (AGPL + commercial isn't exactly unusual, but normally there is a CLA involved)
The (A)GPL does in no way preclude you–or anyone–from selling it. It does, however, require you to provide source code, at least upon request, to those that have received non-source code versions.

That said, the specific arrangement in this case may be a bit strange. There's a "commercial end-user license agreement", which I'm pretty sure is not possible–unless they are the author of all the code in question, in which case they can make up as many licenses as they want.

right, "AGPL+commercial" in my comment meant AGPL + a commercial license.
It isn't!? Next you're going to tell me that Atlassian didn't invent the term Spooning