|
|
|
|
|
by dvtv75
3370 days ago
|
|
NASA isn't tasked with food production or distribution, nor should they be. There are other departments for that. You're shoving the responsibility for the starving masses on NASA and their relatively small budget - why not the military? How is their mission trying to solve the distribution issues? (It's not.) The Gerald R. Ford class aircraft carrier program cost $36 billion (cf. wikipedia), that's more than NASA's budget. Why spend that money there? There are more than enough ships right now. If you cut their budget entirely, you would have hundreds of billions to spend. Or education, a group who are also not tasked with food distribution. Or Homeland Security, again not tasked with food distribution. Why is NASA alone the target of your scorn? What makes you think that, if NASA were folded right up, all the money would be transferred and the starving masses would be fed? They weren't being fed before NASA was created. A good portion of the US don't feel that it's their problem to feed the masses, something that could be readily achieved if there was sufficient political will. |
|