[gnaritas]

Because you're deflecting from the topic. If you can't discuss Trump without deflecting to Hillary, you're not acting in good faith and having a real discussion. Not to mention that you're repeating claims that's been disproved and cleared.

[dr_ick]

Then lets discuss Trump without deflecting to unproven and debunked Russian claims.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_20...

Former Acting CIA Director Michael Morell has stated that he has seen no evidence of collusions between Trump and the Kremlin. "On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire, at all," Morell said.[156]

James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence under President Obama, said there was no evidence of any collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives as of January 2017 when the intelligence community issued its report on the subject.[157]

Here are the facts of today:

Trump was elected President of the United States on November 9th, 2016

The Dow Jones is up 2800+, since Nov 9th.

Trump has issued 19 Executive Orders, 16 Presidential memoranda, 11 Presidential proclamations, and 1 Presidential notice.

[gnaritas]

> Here are the facts of today:

None of those three facts are remotely relevant to whether or not Trump colluded with Russians, you are again being partisan and even mentioning those unrelated facts proves you're too partisan to have a real discussion. And smoke is more than enough to justify a proper investigation.

[dr_ick]

In a thread above you imply that Trump committed Treason. Now you are accusing me of being "too partisan" for a real discussion.

Pot meet kettle.

[gnaritas]

No, I implied that treason is a serious crime, nothing more. I do not know if he's guilty or not, that's why there's an investigation. There's enough shady shit clearly going on that the truth has to be found.