Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Y_Y 3371 days ago
Then why not compress really efficiently by just transmitting packet sizes?
1 comments

Because 50% of them won't be understood?
On the other hand, if you could do it, you'd probably have invented a convoluted speech-to-text (where text is a index into a dictionary of words). Note that you would also likely lose things like inflection, voice, accent etc - so while it might work as a texting system with voice input - it would be a poor substitute for voice chat..