|
|
|
|
|
by srssays
3365 days ago
|
|
> Well, no. If we're going to be pedantic, we should say MiB (mebibytes), because file sizes on disk are expressed in multiples of powers of 2, Not true anymore. OS X (and I assume iOS) reports sizes in power-of-10 units. If you think about it, it is really user-hostile to express file sizes as powers-of-two. Who can remember that a "GiB" is 1073741824 bytes? |
|
I don't think it's terribly user hostile to express sizes as powers of two when you work with these kinds of numbers for a living, especially when it's near the bare metal (Erlang binary data type FTW!)
But I do think it's user hostile to have two different units depending on what you're looking at. If it were all decimal or all binary, it would be much easier.