[sanderjd]

I interpreted the point of the article as being that we tend to focus too much on AGI and not enough of how disruptive "narrow" AI may be. The only thing I disagree with there is that I think lots of people focus a lot on the potential issues of broadening use cases for ML. But I agree that AGI is mostly just a distraction to that discussion.

[nickdavidhaynes]

Agreed all around. At the very least, I don't think it was obvious what message the author was trying to convey.