|
|
|
|
|
by masklinn
3375 days ago
|
|
> here's the edge case though. That's no more an edge case than the cases where you throw away the return value or you're binding to an ambiguous type e.g. `A getFoo()`, `B getFoo()`, `Object foo = getFoo()`. > The more I think about this the more I wonder why this isn't possible. The Java spec does not say, for C++ Stroustrup states it's > to keep resolution for an individual operator or function call context-independent. the Java reason is likely also some sort of Principle of Least Surprise claim. |
|