| > ... told with slightly different subsets of the available facts. What makes me worry about humanity is the fact that you said that with a straight face as if we, as a society, can't (or shouldn't) demand that they tell the story with the same set of facts. Treating the other side with fairness and understanding MEANS acknowledging all the facts. > ... than ask them to converge on exactly the same dry list of uninterpreted facts This is a false dichotomy. > Also, I think people ask for "fairness and understanding" but want a great deal more; And you just twisted my words, which doesn't need to happen in order for us to have a conversation. But you chose to do it anyway because you're not interested in a conversation, you're not interested in fairness, you're interested in pushing a narrative. And it sucks that people like you exist. |