Please, connect the dots for me. An initial skim of the commit messages did not yield any egregious "Utter Disregard for Git Commit History" [1]. Even if it did, it may just mean that the maintainer is focused more on results and robustness than preserving a pristine history of the project.
Don't think that was where I was going. It was more of the none of this stuff is really done, it is hard in this language and help would be appreciated..as understood through the project splash page and then examined through commits?
[1] https://zachholman.com/posts/git-commit-history/