|
|
|
|
|
|
by stordoff
3380 days ago
|
|
|
I'd argue that by advertising browser compatibility[1], meeting the browser trust requirements is implicitly part of the business relationship, thus Google enforcing them does not give rise to tortious interference. (FWIW, I studied English law, but that was some years ago and I am largely unfamiliar with tortious interference) [1] "브라우저 호환성 99.9%" http://www.crosscert.com/symantec/02_0_00.jsp |
|
|