|
|
|
|
|
by kasey_junk
3371 days ago
|
|
This is true except in the case of structural satisfaction for interfaces. You can't trust a rename function in a IDE in go for instance due to this. And in the case of channel select behavior...and ranges over a channel...and the context object, etc. My point being "magic" seems to be code for "familiarity with the language and it's idioms". Which I'll grant might be easier in go because of how limiting it is. |
|