|
|
|
|
|
by OJFord
3379 days ago
|
|
> "software doesn't damage hardware" [not parent's claim] Isn't this trivially false? Of course we can design hardware (+ firmware) that allows software to damage or irrevocably destroy it. So even if we're not willing to accept that alone, it surely follows that some hardware (+ firmware) will (accidentally) be physically vulnerable to malicious software? |
|