|
|
|
|
|
by 3131s
3382 days ago
|
|
> That was the entirety of the Snowden leaks Is that so? So the NSA did not secretly collect all data from the unencrypted fiber between Google and Yahoo's data centers? And the NSA never paid RSA Security 10 million dollars to back Dual_EC_DRBG as part of the broader program Bullrun intended to subvert and weaken cryptographic protocols that underlie our national security and critical online infrastructure? You are aware that the Snowden documents discuss intelligence agencies outside the US as well, and detail our coordination with these agencies? What about spying on allied foreign world leaders? Gag orders placed on the largest companies on earth? Parallel construction? I am almost skeptical that you are intentionally understating the significance of what the Snowden documents revealed. |
|
> So the NSA did not secretly collect all data from the unencrypted fiber between Google and Yahoo's data centers?
I recall mentions of this, but do you have a source for your "all" claim here? As that would be a bit different than passively watching for specifically tasked IPs (or other selectors).
> And the NSA never paid RSA Security 10 million dollars to back Dual_EC_DRBG as part of the broader program Bullrun intended to subvert and weaken cryptographic protocols that underlie our national security and critical online infrastructure?
I believe this was theorized based on something that did look legitimately concerning in a Classification guidance document, but this was not substantiated within the leaks. Did new material come out which substantiated this claim?
> You are aware that the Snowden documents discuss intelligence agencies outside the US as well, and detail our coordination with these agencies?
We definitely partner with agencies outside of the US, this is not a secret.
> What about spying on allied foreign world leaders?
This was also certainly in the leaks. Countries gather intelligence on other countries, whether that is for nonproliferation reasons, understanding military intentions, or other reasons. People are free to believe that this shouldn't happen, but again, not much of a secret.
> Gag orders placed on the largest companies on earth?
What are you referring to here? Collection for FISA targets, or something else? Not very clear (We probably do agree with it being problematic).
> Parallel construction?
This was in articles about the leaks, but I do not believe there was any material in the leaks which indicated that this was a known practice (versus a theory of what might happen).