Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by matt4077 3379 days ago
I don't get that argument. How is a red light camera different than surveillance footage that show a murder? It's not a witness, it's evidence.
2 comments

A murder case would require proving that the person on camera is the accused.

A red light camera generally can't prove you're the person driving your car - they usually don't have the resolution nor the angle to show the driver.

the surveillance footage is evidence, not an accuser.

in your murder example, you would still need to be arrested by a physical person in a police uniform, you would have some interaction with an agent of the state.

when you get a ticket in the mail, who is your accuser? Whose name is on the ticket? what is their badge number? how do i lodge a complaint against this officer? Who is expected to show up in court to prosecute this case?