|
|
|
|
|
by whafro
3379 days ago
|
|
Perhaps not the strongest possible, but I've heard the argument in the past that it violates the confrontation clause of the 6th amendment – that you are unable to face your accuser, since your accuser is simply a timed camera. OTOH, since you can sue property (for example in asset forfeiture cases), that might not hold any water. |
|
If you break into a building and get busted by an automated silent alarm, the alarm isn't the one accusing you.