|
|
|
|
|
by intjk
3378 days ago
|
|
At the end of the article, Scott essentially says the same thing, but emphasizing the other side of the coin: > [...] the question of whether the universe “really” “is” a simulation has barely come up. Why would it, when there are so many more fruitful things to ask? |
|
IANATP but I've read, for example, that violating Lorentz invariance is an active research area.