Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by teh_klev 3383 days ago
Thanks, saved me the bother of saying this as well.

That section on "Reliability" is pure comedy, the only time I had SQL Server "crash" was due to faulty hardware. And despite the best efforts of our previous data centre company (who we've since ditched) dropping the ball and losing power across the site multiple times over two years our MS SQL servers never lost any data, despite the rug being pulled whilst under some fairly heavy workloads. I should add that neither did any of the MySQL fleet, even the ones running replication.

One day when I get time I'll get around disembollocking this flawed article. I don't say that as a MS SQL "fanboy", but as a DBA with coming on for 20 years experience managing and programming SQL Server in banks, blue chips and ISP's (yeah I know, "appeal to authority"-fail, but who the hell is this anonymous author, and what are his credentials?).

Edit: sorry I should add I quite like PostgreSQL, and I'm hoping to roll it out as a service offering to our client base in the next few months, so no axe to grind from me with regards to its features and capabilities.

1 comments

My experience: SQL Server kicks its NAS off the network due to the NAS's own flakiness, but SQL Server has always recovered fine. I've had to boot it in single-user mode many times to cut the thundering herd down to size on startup/recovery, but then it's back to business.