|
|
|
|
|
by famfam
5870 days ago
|
|
I definitely don't think the app is generally appealing. I don't expect that it could replace a normal "todo" system for all people. It's nichey for sure. But there's definitely a subset of people that this system resonates with. The hard part is finding more of those people. I guess it's true of any niche. There may be thousands of coins laying in the sand, but how can I possibly scale finding them all? People (personalities) that may benefit from the tool don't know to look for it, and it's not like something you would share with all your friends (e.g. viral). Thus, I don't see how to grow it. Feature wise, we're using Get Satsifaction, and have had a decent amount of feedback. Most common features are things like making apps (mobile/desktop), APIs or integration (e.g. with RTM) -- these things make sense. Then there is another class of feedback which is like "add priorities" "let me see my tasks" "add recurring tasks" etc. These don't make any sense to me because there are already apps that perfectly fulfill those needs if people have them. Measurement wise, I'm only really tracking "active" users (and tasks entered/completed etc). There's just so little to do, that I don't know if there is any action to take based on it. Anyway, the bigger problem is traffic. Only ~30% or so of my traffic are new visitors. It's really just beginning to boil down to a group of dedicated users and no traffic driving for new visitors. |
|
Obviously not. Those other apps don't offer the simplicity and UI experience that yours does. What you're offering is resonating with some people, but they want what you have right now plus more. People are telling you this, and you're just telling them to go away and use another tool? Your prerogative, but you're asking how to take this to the 'next level', and your users are already telling you how - you don't need to ask HN.