[lostlogin]

That may be legally correct but is that morally ok? How do you apply this to groups history looks upon sympathetically? French partisans come to mind, but there are dozens of other groups that had similar situations. Selectively deciding abuse of humans is ok is a slippery slope. Not wearing a uniform may relate more to total oppression or occupation rather than be an indicator of disregard for civilians.

[mason240]

Yes, it is absolutely morally OK, because it puts pressure on all combatants to follow conventions designed to protect civilians.