[benjiwengy]

The reason why a Basic Income paid out from a LVT is a good idea, is because it reduces costs by leveling the field for all participants in the immovable property market. So that market can then allocate resources at optimal efficiency.

A UBI paid out of taxes on produced factors (income,capital) distorts resource allocation, so we all end up poorer.

Rents would go up, but then so would the LVT and then the UBI until an equilibrium point is reached.

In the US, without any other changes to your tax/welfare system the LVT/UBI would result in every man,woman and child getting around $4000 each. That would rise as rents went up.

That would go up even further if other taxes and benefits were reduced.

[malloryerik]

Very interesting, thanks.

As I'm sure you've been thinking, it seems important because of the looming threat of human labor becoming an obsolete means for the satisfactory distribution of wealth and necessities throughout society.

Do you have any other thoughts about how to address this problem?

[benjiwengy]

I don't think humans adding value with their time, and selling it on the market will ever stop. This has been a misplaced fear for thousands of years, yet we work just as hard as ever. Technology just makes us more productive. So will robots.

The argument for the LVT/BI is that it is not a benefit or a welfare payment, but should be view as a basic human property right. Without which, we are not free.

The LVT really only means we would all be equal share landlords of the value derived from scarce resources supplied for free by nature/god. Basic Income/Public spending is that equal share.

Without that, humans cannot share this Earth as equals, thus will not have taken the final step from being savages to truly civilized beings.

Yes, it really is that big a deal;)