|
|
|
|
|
by bsznjyewgd
3388 days ago
|
|
The first sentence is perfectly comprehensible (factorization is decomposing an object into factors which, when multipled together, gives back the original). As for the most of the rest of the article... there's really no reason for the average Sara to care about polynomial factorization at all (unless it's just algebraic manipulation for doing homework). To promote a scientifically literate society, improve the secondary school curriculum to teach statistics: How does conditional probability work? What do sensitivity and specificity mean? When a poll comes out, what does the margin of error mean? What are some common probability fallacies and how to recognize and avoid them?
Etc. In addition to Khan Academy, also check out the OpenStax textbooks (https://openstax.org/subjects) over the likes of Wikipedia (which is more often a mix of technicalese or a bunch of trivia depending on the subject of the article). |
|
I was the average Sarah, a lot of the people I went to public school with were the below than average sarah and it's the elitist math attitude that's being talked about here that turns kids off from that.
It wasn't until years later, after a career in concept art, then vfx and now programming that I realize..."hey the Fibonacci sequence isn't just some parlor trick for 'math types', it's a thing we can look at to study recursion and integrate in our code to make actual products".
Products that the average sarah uses and maybe even loves and would be supremely interested in learning about but doesn't because she's not a "math person".
I also lament the fact I didn't get into maths and see the beauty of it until years later when it was really too late to get into it at any professional level just because I was always implicitly told I was never meant to be a "math person".
Maybe I'm not, but if we could get more kids into maths, even if they're not geniuses, I think society as a whole and they themselves would greatly benefit from that.