[Veen]

It's curious to me that anti-globalism in the west is so often supportive of authoriatirian rulers and religious extremists elsewhere. It's not as if there's any inconsistency in denouncing Trump, Putin, and Erdogan in one breath. Reminds me of European Communists like Sartre that campaigned for equality in the west while refusing to acknowledge the horrors of Stalin's rule.

[eternalban]

> It's curious to me that anti-globalism in the west is so often supportive of authoriatirian rulers and religious extremists elsewhere.

Globalism is orthogonal to the nature of the global regime. Let us not forget that Communist International was also a globalist movement.

I personally don't know about the "so often" bit, but certainly that is the meme that is pushed by (globalist owned) Media. But should we accept that as a fact, then considering the fact that multiple powers would exist would provide at least the hope of future remedy to citizens of unsavory regimes.

The /only/ hope for remedy for citizens of a (authoritarian) One World Government is catastrophic system failure. That is it.

[Veen]

> catastrophic system failure

Those three words encompasses an awful lot of death and poverty.

[eternalban]

Exactly. To be clear, there is no doubt in my mind that the future of Humanity has to be unified, but I don't believe we're there yet whether we consider the governed or the self-appointed lords, and yet another atempt to create "the new man" to fit in the ideological template imho will entail an awful lot of awfulness.