Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mseebach 3384 days ago
I understand, and I understood before. You're defending the lie by saying that it's only technically incorrect. You do understand that the phrase means that you think it's still substantially correct -- not that it conceivably could be true?
1 comments

I believe it is substantially correct that Uber and companies like it engage in ethically dubious and legally murky anti-union actions.

I believe it implausible that Uber didn't consider the pressure/intimidation aspect that a daily prompt to listen to their propaganda entails when adding it to the system.