Ophthalmologists are specialists just like any other medical specialist, e.g. a dermatologist.
Does the fact that general practitioners refer people on to dermatologists mean that family doctors are not 'real doctors'?
Sorry if that sounds aggressive, I am unfairly taking the inference from what you said that opticians are somehow 'fake'.
> I am unfairly taking the inference from what you said that opticians are somehow 'fake'.
Opticians are equivalent to pharma techs (or dental hygienists as dogma1138 noted), could you be thinking about optometrists (sometimes called Ophthalmic Opticians in the UK)?
You mean physician. An optometrist typically has a Doctor of Optometry degree. One can argue if that's really a Dr. (I'd say it more like an MS), but nonetheless they could be called Dr. They also write prescriptions for lenses.
An optician fits the glasses, which is more like the technician.
An optometry program lasts four years, so that is equivalent to the schooling needed for an MD. (After schooling there is a state and national examination in order to get the license.)
I don't want to be excessively glib here, but general practice in modern medicine is often very close to being "health theater" like the TSA is security theater.
We're not talking about the rural doctors of old, their job could be automated in the next five years or so.