| Things the author failed to include in the study: 1) Road land use, a bike lane is narrower than a car lane. 2) The energy invested in building the car. Aluminium parts, which cars are made of, have very significant energy investments. 3) CO2 emissions of asphalt used to pave the roads that cars drive on. 4) CO2 emissions of the cars tires vs the bikes tires 5) Calorie consumption of the person driving/riding in the car!!!!!!! 6) Parking land use. 7) Land use associated with mining the materials used to build a car vs bike. 8) Land use of pollution barriers to protect residential areas from car intensive ones. 9) CO2 emissions associated with heavy raised roadways made of concrete and steel, such as highway overpasses. Basically, this analysis is laughably absurd and is an insult to the Harvard name. |
I'm just saying that this analysis in particular is simplistic, wrong, and harmful.