|
|
|
Ask HN: Startup built on idea-kernel developed at former employer
|
|
3 points
by cuca_de_chumbo
3395 days ago
|
|
I worked starting 2000 January at a startup in the San Jose area and stayed with the company for 1.5 years approx (i.e., through the dot-com bust/mini-recovery/bust). While I was there we came up with some interesting ideas (I came up with and refined a large portion of these ideas) and filed for 10 patents in 2001. I did a large portion of the patent disclosure work. Long-story short (I will post further about the situation in further comment below) ... * patents filed were never fully pursued by acquiring
company, and all lapsed in 2007 or before
* patent appications have huge value and adequately
describe a beautiful monetizable system -- and due
to lapsed patents, while one could not prevent others
from implementing the same, others cannot successfully
sue a new startup for developing these ideas since
there is fully documented prior art
More details in a further comment ... |
|
The dot-com bust and post-9/11 biz environment were not friendly to most startups and not friendly to big hard-to-implement ideas, and the startup company was rescued in 2002 or 2003 by a sideline project (largely not using the IP in the patents) in which a large I.T./storage company saw value. The large company acquired the startup.
The 10 patent applications, in the mean time, were not maintained or perhaps not novel enough to all merit patents -- though I doubt the "not novel enough" part -- I've seen stupid patents awarded for much less innovation, and I haven't yet seen the system the patents deal with implemented or sold. So ... I think there's huge value in the ideas behind the patent applications. The patent applications all lapsed around 2007 or before, I believe because they were peripheral to large company's business and nobody realized what they had in hand.
The ideas and system behind the patents only grow more relevant each passing year.
So what I see right now:
I should probably discuss with an I.P. lawyer ...... but my inclination is to:
Any suggestions?