Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by icebraining 3391 days ago
Assuming for a minute that containers aren't in play, then the isolation model becomes that of a server/vm with the associated overhead of each.

Why? There's nothing magical about a container, it's literally just a cgroup of Linux processes. You don't have to use them to get the memory isolation we're talking about - uncontained processes get it too.

That's what we do: one process per client, uncontained, just running on a different system user.

But in any case, sure, use containers, I'm certainly not opposed to them.

1 comments

That really isn't practical given the number of datacentres CF are in * the number of free customers they have.

Perhaps for some tier of paid customer.