|
|
|
|
|
by Chris2048
3392 days ago
|
|
> You seems to be turning this into some sort of us vs. them game based on your faulty projections Really, how so? you're the one assuming the authority of philosophy, not me. How are my projections 'faulty'? You just keep pivoting, and claiming there to be some counterpoint, somewhere, even though you can't seem to supply them yourself. > you can start with some very introductory resources No thanks, implicit to this move is the suggestion that I need to read "very introductory" material. I don't. > That would go into philosophy of science, which I have absolutely no familiarity with Then you have no basis for arguing with me? |
|