|
|
|
|
|
|
by jryle70
3392 days ago
|
|
|
No, the proper analogy is to vent against Java multi threading complexity in a Go concurrency topic, which serves nothing but distraction to the discussion. To illustrate that, how about we talk about the brutal crackdown of illegal immigration in Russia:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/06/russia-immigra... Or expand even further -- to understand the anti-immigration sentiment -- let's discuss how the Chinese "invade" Russia's far east:
http://thediplomat.com/2016/01/russia-china-and-the-far-east... See my point? You're free to open a new thread about US immigration issues. In fact there're already plenty of ongoing threads exploring the bad side of the politics, society, economy in the US. Are you worried your new thread wouldn't pique the interest around here? |
|
|
Not sure what the point is though. Why shouldn't we talk about this (brutal crackdown of illegal immigration in Russia) in a subthread on this article?
It also seems totally relevant, e.g. to compare USSR-era border control to today's Russia, etc.
>Are you worried your new thread wouldn't pique the interest around here?
No, I'm worried about artificially limiting discussion to very narrow confines around a single particular topic.
Which doesn't even make sense. How much stuff can anybody here say about Mott's case in particular? And what's to say about it specifically that's not already in TFA?
It's the wider implications and issues around that that we all can contribute something to, and that's what makes conversation interesting.