"Below are the guidelines that were used in defining the UCS
transformation format:
[...]
6) It should be possible to find the start of a character efficiently starting from an arbitrary location in a byte stream."
If they used "10" as a marker for "this is the start of a two-byte sequence", it could not have been used for "this is a byte in a multi-byte sequence, but not the first one"
"10" is used as a prefix for the bytes after the first. This gives it the self-synchronization property if it somehow ends up in the middle of a sequence. See the first table in this Wikipedia link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8
Additionally, 110xxxxx tells you that the character is two bytes, 1110xxxx three bytes, and 11110xxx four bytes, i.e., number of bytes in number = leading 1 count.
The goal is that by reading any byte you can tell if you are at the start of a character sequence, so we have to start each byte with some prefix – otherwise continuation bytes might sometimes look like start bytes. If we did as you suggest, we'd have to prefix continuation bytes with "111110", leaving only two bits of data in each!
"Below are the guidelines that were used in defining the UCS transformation format: [...] 6) It should be possible to find the start of a character efficiently starting from an arbitrary location in a byte stream."
If they used "10" as a marker for "this is the start of a two-byte sequence", it could not have been used for "this is a byte in a multi-byte sequence, but not the first one"