|
|
|
|
|
by lispm
3397 days ago
|
|
> You understand that not everything politicians say is recorded? That said, Burg has literally no reason to lie about this. So all you have is that? Let's sum it up: there is no recording of that, there are no witnesses, there has been no transcript, Schulz himself has never acknowledged it, there are no other sources where Schulz has said anything like that, ... All you have is a sentence which is circulating in right-wing groups. It's actually obvious that Germany in its current form exists and that Martin Schulz aims to be its next chancellor. > All you've done is prove my point Sure not. > even people who work for the EU for a long time appear to have plenty of conflicting non-EU interests. What does it have to do with Martin Schulz? |
|
> right-wing groups
Haaretz, a liberal Israeli newspaper, is a "right wing group"?
> What does it have to do with Martin Schulz?
I feel like I'm chatting with a bot; do you remember the course of our conversation?
Yes, Schulz has been working for the EU for a long time; he also, apparently, has had strong interests outside the EU for as well. Why do you think many Europeans feel betrayed by the EU?