Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Johnny555 3396 days ago
I think it comes down to how important your ELB logs are -- if they are important enough that you don't want to allow traffic without logs (i.e. if you're using them for some sort of auditing/compliance), then failing when it can't write the logs seems like the right choice.
1 comments

Thanks, that is a fair perspective. In our case we're using ELB logs as a redundant trace and it isn't critical that our traffic stops if the access logs fail. It would be nice if this behavior became a toggle in ELB settings, but think we can set something up to disable access logs programatically if we start seeing S3 issues.
Good luck with this. We tried to make changes yesterday to mitigate impact but AWS console was also affected. Was hesitant to make API calls for the changes since we werent sure they would complete successfully given all the services we found actually depended on S3 internally.