|
|
|
|
|
by kbenson
3401 days ago
|
|
> that you have the equivalent of an "analog hole" because you can write a browser extension / patch that taps all the data and the inside code can't tell. Even if it isn't, it's not like the browser itself is just some binary blob these days. Taking the source for firefox or blink or webkit and compiling your own version with slight changes is not only possible, it's already done in many instances. What's Mozilla's response when you take their browser and provide a fork with the sole change being to provide more freedom and choice? Not that it even matters, as it's not like you need to get mindshare from the public for this, developers that want to see the source will actively search for and find solutions, or make their own. There are simple extensions to bypass CORS controls for most (all?) browsers. If they didn't exist, browser variants disabling those same security mechanisms would exist. It's all opt-in gentlemen's agreement style security. Both ends have to by in for it to work, and you control your end... |
|