|
|
|
|
|
by Joeboy
3393 days ago
|
|
Since you ask, I think a neglected part of the solution might lie in getting businesses to communicate securely. Unlike individuals, businesses actually care quite a lot if their data leaks. I think maybe people have wasted a lot of time trying to peddle crypto to hippies and politicos, when lawyers and insurance companies might have been a more receptive audience. The only way PGP was ever going to get any adoption was if people feared getting fired for sending unencrypted private info. And of course once there's a critical mass of people who know what a private key is due to their work, it's a smaller step to get individuals to encrypt things voluntarily. |
|
How are you coming to that conclusion? Companies may say they take security seriously and they want to avoid becoming the next Sony or Home Depot, but how many actually allocate resources accordingly? It's much more efficient to just issue a press release and offer to pay for credit monitoring services that virtually nobody will actually use.