[bluejekyll]

What you're asking for is a pure form of meritocracy, which I think is generally a good thing but does have negatives.

The problem is, how do you measure impact and performance? If you have someone on a team that spends a ton of time helping other engineers with their coding problems, their own commit rate will be lower. If you have someone who checks in a ton of code (not a great messure of ability), they may cause a ton of breakages and bugs for others, a detriment to the group overall.

Meritocracies can be gamed, and any measure you decide to track, will be gamed. At some point machines will definitely be able to track all of these data points, and incorporate them into a model, but it's still only going to have a view of the world based on the data it is fed.

This means that people will game it, and then you have a similar issue as today. While I agree with you in principle, the implementation will not be perfect.