Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by baq 3406 days ago
from the article

> They question itself was already curious but if we dive deeper into the story we see the claims have been made by Semi-Accurate, not the most unbiased source.

yup, charlie loves to make fun of intel, but then, this is different.

further down, in the comments:

> (wccftech) This article has an update on it. It says:

> [UPDATED – Feb 26 2017 7:16 PM ET]

> The editors-in-chief of two of America’s top PC hardware and technology publications have confirmed to Wccftech that they have indeed been approached by Intel regarding upcoming Ryzen reviews. Although both said that it was business as usual. Affirming that Intel’s response following AMD’s Ryzen announcement was what they had expected it to be. Adding that nothing was particularly unusual about the emails they received from Intel.

> [End of update]

maybe it really is business as usual...?

2 comments

If it is business as usual, that kind of makes it worse.

Then again, we have no idea what was in those emails, and wccftech is openly pro-amd, so even though I have no reason to think they're lying, they might easily still be interpreting things in an overly negative light.

Without a better overview (or at the very least somebody who has that overview and you trust to be relatively unbiased) it's hard to be sure what to make of this (IMHO).

>If it is business as usual, that kind of makes it worse.

Welcome to the world of business where participants are required to do everything with a sufficiently positive risk/reward ratio whether legal or not.

It's just business, as per this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13744390

Yeah, but I'd be surprised if Charlie didn't squawk about it, when it comes to vendor demands, I just don't see him going silently into the night if Intel asked him to benchmark it in a certain manner.

Edit: Charlie did complain: http://wccftech.com/intel-playing-dirty-undercut-amd-ryzen/