|
|
|
|
|
by command_codes
3400 days ago
|
|
Regrettably at the moment cannot parse through this entire thread but surely proponents are aware that global temperature seems to have fluctuated within historical record, and not just the Little Ice Age Extending further, we know that paleoclimates could be radically different and have oscillated. I knew this even in elementary school Is Earth's climate changing? Of course; and that is because of course it will. Should we tax ourselves to feel good about it? I think a dubious prospect, in light that climate already changes in absence of anthropogenic activity, therefore there must be certainty; furthermore, a tax won't even help, as massive noncompliant countries such as China industrialize Then there is always curiously left out the consideration, now forgotten depending on your birthyear, that scientists of a recent generation were up in arms about global cooling instead I think there is danger of a curious autism and naivete re: the trustworthiness of certain scientists - remember they are people - coupled with a kind of religious fanaticism |
|
Respectfully, I think you might be entirely missing the point of why people want to do something about climate change.
> Then there is always curiously left out the consideration, now forgotten depending on your birthyear, that scientists of a recent generation were up in arms about global cooling instead
It is not forgotten, but it is untrue: see for example the discussion in The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus (http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1).