|
|
|
|
|
by exception_e
3404 days ago
|
|
I do see your point, but I personally like the delineation of "web app" being something that has higher modern web requirements and "website" being something that should work on something like IE9. That is not to say that UX should be thrown out of the window for the former, of course. I do agree that something like NYT shouldn't be a web app. EDIT: I should mention that a lot of these things come down to requirements, of course. I don't think it's fair to say that every web app must be PWA compliant... it depends! |
|
The biggest argument seems to be laziness: "Progressive enhancement is hard, here's a term that I can apply liberally to give myself an excuse not to bother". That may make a good business argument on a case-by-case basis, but it's not an absolute, and I don't see why it necessarily applies to webapps but not to websites.
Also, React has made progressive enhancement a lot easier than it used to be