Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by striglia 3404 days ago
As someone currently at the "prove it's a good idea" stage of moving production from SWF to SFN, I'm happy to hear it's been such a good experience in practice!

I think I'm mostly excited to stop locally representing/maintaining/enforcing the state machine -- it's been a huge source of toil for very little benefit. Hoping the cheapness of a new state machine will encourage splitting them when it makes sense instead of inflating/complicating an existing workflow...

How are the latency gains in practice? Specifically the activity -> decision -> activity interstitial latency in SFN vs the old SWF style.

1 comments

I haven't actually worked with activities in SFN, just the pure Lambda state machines. But I can tell you those are fast. Like single-digit millisecond latency between states fast.