|
|
|
|
|
by striglia
3404 days ago
|
|
As someone currently at the "prove it's a good idea" stage of moving production from SWF to SFN, I'm happy to hear it's been such a good experience in practice! I think I'm mostly excited to stop locally representing/maintaining/enforcing the state machine -- it's been a huge source of toil for very little benefit. Hoping the cheapness of a new state machine will encourage splitting them when it makes sense instead of inflating/complicating an existing workflow... How are the latency gains in practice? Specifically the activity -> decision -> activity interstitial latency in SFN vs the old SWF style. |
|