Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by alphonsegaston 3403 days ago
So despite having spied on anyone who caught their fancy in the past-

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/13/uber-empl...

-your bar for skepticism/reproach is only cleared with proof that they've done the exact same thing before, telegraphing their intentions along the way?

Ok.

1 comments

That article alleges poor controls around customer data, not coordinated action. It seems unrelated to what we were discussing, which was likelihood of Uber to - reusing my earlier phrasing - try to discredit, disparage, or defame Susan Fowler.
Well, you should still probably quit because they already send thugs to intimidate women/former employees in the way you said was unacceptable:

https://www.buzzfeed.com/charliewarzel/former-uber-worker-cl...

There's some clear differences, and it's alleged not confirmed. That said, I'll look into it.