Your point is still incorrect. CloudFlare is NOT playing "internet cop" for DOS. They're providing armor against it, but they're not "policing" it in any sense of the word.
So DOS are "clearly bad" when it comes to providing "armour" against them, but a matter of taste, something a person could not possibly have an opinion on when it's a client of theirs?
> they're not "policing" it in any sense of the word.
I didn't say they do, I say it's double faced. Which it is.
> they're not "policing" it in any sense of the word.
I didn't say they do, I say it's double faced. Which it is.