|
|
|
|
|
|
by neutralid
3402 days ago
|
|
|
> Team members who believe in their leadership tend to be more effective. Patients who believe in their care have better recovery rates. There may be other factors regarding recovery rates perhaps counter-intuitive with respect to the presence of leadership (or appearance of leadership). Somewhat related: https://hms.harvard.edu/news/startling-benefit-cardiology-me... "High-risk patients with certain acute heart conditions are more likely to survive than other similar patients if they are admitted to the hospital during national cardiology meetings, when many cardiologists are away from their regular practices." |
|
|
"The researchers found that certain intensive procedures were performed less often on the high-risk patients in the study during meeting dates than outside meeting dates.
One explanation for these findings, the researchers said, is that physicians who don’t attend the conferences take a more conservative approach for high-risk patients; another is that the physicians who stayed behind were reluctant to perform intensive procedures on another physician’s patients while that doctor was out of town. Survival rates might be higher because, for high-risk patients with cardiovascular disease, the harms of intensive procedures may unexpectedly outweigh the benefits."
This sounds a little like the programming conference effect. Where someone comes home excited about a new way of doing things, and applies it without first proving it out in isolation. Except people die.